dep wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2001 08:18 pm, Lee wrote:
>
> | Hide the cookie jar mother! The boobs and cockroaches are at it
> | again! Does this suit mean that I can sue the racetrack and other
> | horse owners if the horse I bet on lost even if it was a 100 to 1
> | shot? Unfortunately, they'll probably win. I believe there is a
> | section of the Endangered Species Act dealing with the protection
> | of the North American Greedy Lawyer Hirer who invest in the initial
> | offerings of companies like usedtoiletpaper.com
>
> this festering infection isn't, alas, unique to north america, as
> witness the equally ridiculous german adobe nonsense involving
> killustrator which, it appears, will be settled with no one injured
> and only about 10 orders of magnitude more work and fuss than there
> would have been had adobe merely approached the kde folk and stated
> their objections.
>
> but the u.s. situation is quite bad enough on its own, and without
> vast tort reform -- including, perhaps, the public execution of a
> plaintiff's lawyer chosen at random daily
>Snip
How about we amend the Constitution to allow for a two week hunting season on all
lawyers
(including those in public office and on the bench). Because of the expected
popularity of the
hunt , licenses may have to be issued by lottery. All proceeds shall be used to pay
game
wardens to insure that bag limits, tagging, and size limits are adhered to. Any funds
left over
can be deposited in a fund to pay off the plaintiffs in frivolous law suits. While this
wouldn't stop greed or frivolous lawsuits it would keep the herd of lawyers from
overgrazing
the economy.
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
