You will need the QT 2.3.0 if you upgrade to KDE2.1.1 or higher. If you are
going to keep/use any KDE1.1.2 programs, you will need to keep QT 1.44. QT
2.x is not backward compatible to QT 1.xx. Likewise when QT 3.x is release
early next year, it will not be backward compatible to QT2.x.
Jim
On Sunday July 29, 2001 3:27 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that qt2 (latest version) a complete replacement
> for all previous versions of QT?
>
> If so, is there any compelling reasons to keep QT 1.xx around on the
> harddrive?
>
> Thank you, in advance.
--
3:42pm up 5 days, 16:16, 3 users, load average: 0.07, 0.21, 0.25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running Caldera eD2.4 - Linux - because life is too short for reboots...
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
