dep wrote: > | > | Which is precisely why WTC *should* be rebuilt -- I'd rather roast > | in hell than even appear to be intimidated. > > yup. entirely right. and here's what it should look like: > > http://www.scripting.com/images/flippinTheWtc.jpg Outstanding! _______________________________________________ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
- wtc2.org? Douglas J. Hunley
- Re: wtc2.org? Net Llama
- Re: wtc2.org? Bill Campbell
- Re: wtc2.org? Douglas J. Hunley
- Re: wtc2.org? JW
- Re: wtc2.org? Kurt Wall
- Re: wtc2.org? dep
- Re: wtc2.org? Rick Sivernell
- Re: wtc2.org? Kurt Wall
- Re: wtc2.org? Ian Marchak
- Re: wtc2.org? Kurt Wall
- RE: wtc2.org? Condon Thomas A KPWA
- Re: wtc2.org? Chang
- Re: wtc2.org? Ian Marchak