>
> I have to agree on this: after running Libranet for several months
> and getting used to the irritating Debian anal retentive security
> policies, I am "comfortable" with this distro, the way I am
> "comfortable" with eDesk 2.4. Perhaps the common quality is both
> distros give one a sense of confidence.
>
> Caldera WS 3.1 was a discomfort at first because COAS was gone, but
> after playing with it a while I can appreciate the logic in the
> integration of the admin tools into KDE. Last night I upgraded to
> KDE 2.2 (using a CD obtained from chguy), and after it finally dawned
> on me that you can't upgrade KDE while in it, I had KDE 2.2 installed
> and running in ten minutes. Very impressive end product. A new
> Libranet was due out this month, but has been postponed. I suspect
> the delay is in order to include KDE 2.2. It should be impressive
> too.
I've been waiting for the announcement on the new Libranet, didn't know
it had been delayed. Somebody on the list said it was going up to
$40.00, but that's OK, don't mind paying $40.00 for an OS that works
reliably. Hate paying $200-$300 for one that's unreliable, though.
Randy Donohoe
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
