On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 03:55:30 -0600 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Roger Oberholtzer wrote: | % On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:25:46 -0600 | % Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | % | % I did compile KDE2.2 with it. I have a feeling that it worked better than | % 2.95.3, which I used with kde2.2.1. | % | % Note one thing: gcc 3.0 added a new runtime library to the picture: | % | % libgcc.so | | Hm. libgcc was present in the (now ancient) egcs, specifically, egcs | 2.91.66, so I'm not sure it is unqiue or new to gcc 3.0. Naytheless, | it is probably a moot point. It was earlier a static libgcc.a, so it was resolved at link time and not seen afterwards. In 3.0 it is dynamic and must travel with the binary (unless the target system has a compatible version already installed). There was a big discussion on this in the gcc groups. I personally consider this more than moot. The "C" library is not the only thing one has to consider when delivering binaries compiled with 3.0. -- ===================================================================== Roger Oberholtzer E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OPQ Systems AB WWW: http://www.opq.se Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 115 32 Stockholm Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 Sweden Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 _______________________________________________ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
