Ienup Sung wrote on 2001-01-25 19:32 UTC: > I also saw your implementation came with xterm at XF86 4.0.2. I think it's > a good implementation but I dont't think it is achieving the best possible > performance since you are doing binary search and has many if expressions. Don't think, measure first (realistic conditions: determine the line widths of a screen full of lines after the wcwidth table has been removed from the L1 cache). Modern CPU's execute 10x faster than the main memory can provide new data. Access locality is a frequently underestimated performance factor. Markus -- Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/> - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: backspace and doublewi... Bruno Haible
- Re: what backspace means Bruno Haible
- Re: kernel tty patches Ienup Sung
- Re: kernel tty patches Ienup Sung
- Re: kernel tty patches Bruno Haible
- Re: kernel tty patches Markus Kuhn
- Re: kernel tty patches Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: kernel tty patches Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: kernel tty patches Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: kernel tty patches Bruno Haible
- Re: kernel tty patches Markus Kuhn
- Re: kernel tty patches Ienup Sung
- Re: kernel tty patches Bruno Haible
- Re: kernel tty patches Ienup Sung
- Re: kernel tty patches Ienup Sung
- Re: kernel tty patches Ienup Sung
- Re: backspace, erase modes Bruno Haible
- backspace policy (Re: kernel tty patches) Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: backspace policy (Re: kernel tty pa... Markus Kuhn
- Re: backspace policy (Re: kernel tt... Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: backspace policy (Re: kernel tt... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk