Thanks for your help. My problem is that when I register these
fonts with the X server, they all appear as a set of standard ISo-
8859-* fonts; it is quite possible that this is my fault, that I am
doing something wrong, but I have not been able to get around this
at all.
Tomas
> I don't think that's a very correct description, at least not for Code2000
> (and I doubt for other truetype fonts). What do you mean by "internally"?
> The physical order of glyph data stored in the .ttf file, or the glyph
> index numbers used internally to reference them? Neither are necessarily
> identical, and at least in Code2000 neither reflects any 8-bit codepages.
> Actually both happen to follow the ordering in Unicode. Only, there are
> naturally gaps due to unassigned (or unsupported) codepoints, and there are
> also glyphs not mapped to from any Unicode codepoint directly but only
> referenced by OpenType features.
>
> > I am looking for a font that is coded as a
> > martix
>
> If that means that the glyph indeces should equal the Unicode codepoint
> numbers for every glyph, I doubt you'll find anything like that in
> TrueType. It's part of the very definition of TrueType that internal glyph
> indeces are hardly ever identical to the character set codepoints used
> externally to access them. They are supposed to be always mapped through a
> CMAP lookup table, as far as I know.
>
>
> Lukas
>
>
>
> -
> Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
> Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
>
*********************************************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.frydrych.net
PGP keys: http://www.frydrych.net/contact.html
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
