Hi Darren, On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Darren Longhorn wrote: > Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Darren, > > > > On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Darren Longhorn wrote: > >> Unfortunately, yes. One of the embedded platforms I develop for is based > >> around 2.6.10. > > > > Ok. Do you have a public repository somewhere ? Do you have to apply lots > > of changes to the uvcvideo driver ? Have you tried backporting v4l core > > the 2.6.10 ? > > Unfortunately not, as yet. I keep my modified code in a local CVS > repository. I import uvcvideo onto a vendor branch. That usually takes > care of applying changes to the driver. Most of the backport changes I > made you later incorporated into SVN.
Ok. > There are quite a few other changes related to allocating contiguous > physical memory for the captured frames. As that's specific to your platform I can't really integrate that in the mainline driver. If there are any change required to compile and run the driver on 2.6.10 that I can integrate please let me know. > So far I have not had any reason to try and backport v4l core. It's > something I should investigate. I'll try to minimise the amount of work for both of us during the transition to mercurial (if it happens) so I'm very interesting in all input and feedback you can give. There's no urgency though (at least on my side). Cheers, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
