Hi, 2009/8/26 Rogier Wolff <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:32:42PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> I can thus only judge the quality of MS cameras by the number of >> user requests I receive. I can't tell you about the VX-6000, but >> someone tried the VX-7000 without success. > > You judge the quality, and? > > I've been watching out for an affordable 1.3 Mpixel webcam for a while > now, and I always thought the VX-6000 was a decent uvc-supported > candidate... And it's been out for years now, so I'd guess someone > would've tried it by now. >
I guess most linux users just rather avoid MS stuff .-) >> I would advice going for Logitech cameras. If you need good light >> sensitivity, go for a high-end device. > > But here you don't say someone has tried.... Do you think they will > work? > Logitech is actually very supportive for linux, please check: http://forums.quickcamteam.net/ there is a linux section were you can get some feedback on logitech webcams under linux. > The cameras have marketing specs of "video up to 1280x1024", and > "frame rates up to 30 fps". I can of course accept that it's possible > to run at lower framerates and framesizes. But my experience is that > when they formulate it like this, the camera can't do 1280x1024 at > 30fps... Do you have hints that this camera is capable of > 1280x1...@30fps? You are reading this wrong! There is no direct relation between the presented max frame rate and the max resolution, for 1280x1024 you can only get ~5 fps but for lower resolutions the max frame rate is 30 fps. Best regards, Paulo _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
