Luca Coelho <[email protected]> writes:

> From: Shahar S Matityahu <[email protected]>
>
> Read fseq info from FW registers and print it upon fw assert.
> The print is needed since the fseq version coming from the TLV might
> not be the actual version that is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shahar S Matityahu <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <[email protected]>

[...]

> +void iwl_fw_error_print_fseq_regs(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt)
> +{
> +     struct iwl_trans *trans = fwrt->trans;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     int i;
> +     struct {
> +             u32 addr;
> +             const char *str;
> +     } fseq_regs[] = {
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_ERROR_CODE),
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_TOP_INIT_VERSION),
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_CNVIO_INIT_VERSION),
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_OTP_VERSION),
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_TOP_CONTENT_VERSION),
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_ALIVE_TOKEN),
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_CNVI_ID),
> +             FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_CNVR_ID),
> +             FSEQ_REG(CNVI_AUX_MISC_CHIP),
> +             FSEQ_REG(CNVR_AUX_MISC_CHIP),
> +             FSEQ_REG(CNVR_SCU_SD_REGS_SD_REG_DIG_DCDC_VTRIM),
> +             FSEQ_REG(CNVR_SCU_SD_REGS_SD_REG_ACTIVE_VDIG_MIRROR),
> +     };

Can fseq_regs be static const?

-- 
Kalle Valo

Reply via email to