On 2/11/14, 16:04, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Hart, Darren <darren.h...@intel.com> >wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> While looking to update the MinnowBoard dora BSP I noticed that the >>minnow >> platform drivers Greg added to LTSI were not in standard/ltsi. Did you >> drop those in favor of the minnow-io feature? > >standard/ltsi is applied on top of the standard branch contents, and since >we already had the minnow io features in there, I checked the patches >and went with the ones already in the standard branch. Ah, but I'm talking about minnow-io, which is not in the standard branch, it exists only in features/minnow-io (and greg's LTSI, but not standard/ltsi). > >> >> I see the standard/base and standard/ltsi branches are at the same >>commit >> ID. What is the expected usage here? If you want LTSI, are you expected >>to >> specify standard/ltsi? Or is that just a staging branch, and everything >> can be assumed to have the contents of LTSI? (The latter was my >> expectation, but I wanted to be sure). > >All branches have LTSI contained with them, so you can use any branch >in the tree and be assured that you have LTSI + anything extra on the >branch, but definitely an exact superset of LTSI. > >So yep, you have it right, standard/ltsi is just where I staged the LTSI >integration, and where I'll merge any updates to it. Ack, thanks. -- Darren Hart Yocto Project - Linux Kernel Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto