On 2/11/14, 21:22, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: >> >> patch 0001-gpio-sch-Add-sch_gpio_resume_set_enable.patch >> patch 0002-minnowboard-Add-base-platform-driver-for-the-MinnowB.patch >> patch 0003-minnowboard-gpio-Export-MinnowBoard-expansion-GPIO.patch >> patch 0004-minnowboard-keys-Bind-MinnowBoard-buttons-to-arrow-k.patch > >Right, I had left these as an "on demand" feature in the kernel-cache, >but I'd rather have them integrated to avoid mistakes like this in >the future. > >> >> >> If we add these to standard/ltsi, then we just need to drop the patches >> from the minnow-io fragment. Of course they will need to stay in the >> fragment for linux-yocto-dev as it won't have the LTSI bits and these >> patches will not go upstream as they are placeholders until there is >> proper device properties support in ACPI and the drivers can be updated >>to >> use that. >> >> If you prefer to leave these as patches in minnow-io.scc, I'm fine with >> that and will keep the BSP files consistent across versions. > >I've added the 4 missing patches to standard/ltsi and then merged that >to all the branches. I've also commented out the patches in the minnow-io >feature .scc file on the meta branch. So any references to that feature >won't end up with patch failures. > >I've also added the minnow-io feature to the -dev kernel (it was missing). > >These are now pushed to the servers, and I'll send SRCREV updates along >with a few other pending patches shortly. > >> >> I just noticed the gap and wanted to make sure it was intentional. How >> would you like to handle it? > >See above :)
Great, thanks :-) -- Darren Hart Yocto Project - Linux Kernel Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto