On 2017-02-08 15:14, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2017-02-08 01:23 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2017-02-08 05:10, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On 2017-02-06 1:49 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> From: Christian Storm <christian.st...@siemens.com> >>>> >>>> While there are intel-quark configurations for the KTYPEs standard and >>>> tiny in bsp/intel-common, there's none for the preempt-rt KTYPE. >>>> Trying to build preempt-rt enabled kernels such as linux-yocto-rt for >>>> intel-quark yields a .config having a potentially misconfigured >>>> architecture. More importantly, however, preempt-rt related CONFIG >>>> options are not enabled. Hence, a build of, e.g., linux-yocto-rt, does >>>> not result in a preempt-rt enabled kernel. >>>> >>>> This patch qualifies to be (back)ported to other branches than master. >>> >>> I've merged this to the 4.9 and master kernel-cache branches. I'll >>> send SRCREV updates for it in my next consolidated pull request. >>> >>> If they are needed for other releases, i.e. morty, it is an easy >>> cherry pick. >> >> Thanks! For morty, you should also merge it to the 4.8 branch, and we >> would be happy if you could add it to 4.4 as well, with corresponding >> SRCREV patches. > > Sounds fine to me! > > I just cherry picked them to 4.8 and 4.4 as well. >
What is the ETA for the SRCREV updates? Just wondering if we need a local workaround or if there is an upstream change in sight. Not seeing anything on the list yet, though. Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto