在 2019/7/23 21:03, qwang2 写道:

On 7/23/19 8:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:29 AM qwang2 <quanyang.w...@windriver.com> wrote:

On 7/22/19 11:34 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:24 AM <quanyang.w...@windriver.com> wrote:
From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.w...@windriver.com>

Hi Bruce,

Would you please help merge these 2 patches to linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc branch?
I've merged the patches.

Also note: I'm about to move linux-yocto-dev to v5.3-rc1, so I've
created a set of v5.2 branches in the main linux-yocto repository, and
I have merged the xlnx-soc work there.

So if you can try switching to:

https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto/log/?h=v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc

The content is the same as the linux-yocto-dev branch.

I'm going to generate linux-yocto_5.2 recipes shortly, but they aren't
quite ready yet. Contact me if you have trouble building that branch
without the recipes and I  can send you the in progress ones.

Also, if you do a port to 5.3, let me know and we can re-establish the
branch in linux-yocto-dev.
Hi Bruce,

I will do a port to 5.3.  But before I finish porting, I hope we can
retain the branch standard/xlnx-soc
I have 5.3-rc1 building and booting with the base set of features now.

Is there a reason why the branch I created in linux-yocto/5.2 won't
work while you are doing the port ? I'd like to push the 5.3 kernel
changes in the next day or so, and they will clobber that branch.

Hi Bruce,

For me, I plan to begin porting to 5.3 after I fix bugs and enable the remaining

features. So I hope to maintain this branch in linux-yocto-dev but not only linux-yocto.

But if retaining this branch bring inconvience, you can delete it.

I will switch to linux-yocto/5.2 to do the fixing bug.
Bruce,

Another reason is we have some test always tracking on linux-yocto-dev/standard/xlnx-soc, rather than linux-yocto/v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc. There might be a gap between 5.3 changes is pushed and port for v5.3 is done. So the xlnx SDK full features can't be tested during that time.

But anyway, please go ahead with your change if that is a standard procedure, we will tune our internal plan accordingly. And we will do the v5.3 port ASAP.

Regards,
Yunguo


Thanks,

Quanyang


Bruce

and don't delete it.

Thanks,

Quanyang

Bruce

Limeng (1):
driver: pcie: reset pcie device with MIO31 on xilinx-zcu102 platform

Quanyang Wang (1):
drm: xlnx: zynqmp_dp: initialize delayed work before enable interrupts

   .../boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-revA.dts    |  1 +
   drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c              |  3 +-
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
   3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.17.1




--
_______________________________________________
linux-yocto mailing list
linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto

Reply via email to