Hi Christophe, I assigned the fe80::/64 addresses manually because I need to know them for the script. Because they are derived from the MAC address, it could have happened that I don't know them at the time I run the script. However, you're right: in my specific setup, I have the control over the MAC address that is assigned on the node, so I should be able to derive the fe80:: address easily.
Now, you say that assigned addresses and SLAAC addresses behave differently. I thought it was a sorted out not that long ago. Could you be more specific about the issue you encountered? Regards, Tony Le 2013-04-11 16:22, Christophe Aeschlimann a écrit : > Hi Tony, > > Le 11.04.2013 15:57, Tony Cheneau a écrit : >> Hi Ralph, >> >> First, thank you for your patches. I've tested them yesterday. >> Because >> I didn't had enough hardware to perform a proper packet capture, so >> I >> just checked the connectivity. >> >> I could run all my regression tests (ICMP, TCP, UDP, varying packet >> length) between two linux hosts with your patches applied. They all >> passed and looked fine. > > I had a look at your regression test script, cool stuff. I adapted it > a > bit to allow to remote control my units (not full PC). Is there a > reason > why you configure the fe80:: addresses manually ? Shouldn't you use > the > one automatically generated ? I've seen differences here between the > two > cases. > > Best regards, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel