Hi Alex, Just to confirm that if a patch changes iphc.c then there should be separate patch for 6lowpan_bt and another for 6lowpan_rtnl.
- Martin. On 14/07/14 13:33, Alexander Aring wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:55:09AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> I'm unsure whether you want me to make changes to the bluetooth functions >> that are going to be affected or will the bluetooth guys do this. >> > In your patch series should iphc.c fix in only one patch, then another > patch for bluetooth side and also a patch for the 6lowpan_rtnl side. > > Make it like "this should work", then the bluetooth community will > test/review it. Okay maybe review only, but they had the chance if it's > broken afterwards. But what we not do is change the behaviour for memory > managment in generic iphc.c code and then we need to care about 6lowpan > bluetooth code. It should not broken afterwards. > > ... but I think in both implementation is the memory managment on error > handling a mess. > > - Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck® Code Sight™ - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel