Hi Alex,

Just to confirm that if a patch changes iphc.c then there should be separate 
patch for 6lowpan_bt and another for 6lowpan_rtnl.

- Martin.

On 14/07/14 13:33, Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:55:09AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I'm unsure whether you want me to make changes to the bluetooth functions 
>> that are going to be affected or will the bluetooth guys do this.
>>
> In your patch series should iphc.c fix in only one patch, then another
> patch for bluetooth side and also a patch for the 6lowpan_rtnl side.
>
> Make it like "this should work", then the bluetooth community will
> test/review it. Okay maybe review only, but they had the chance if it's
> broken afterwards. But what we not do is change the behaviour for memory
> managment in generic iphc.c code and then we need to care about 6lowpan
> bluetooth code. It should not broken afterwards.
>
> ... but I think in both implementation is the memory managment on error
> handling a mess.
>
> - Alex


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck®
Code Sight™ - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to