Hi Alex,

>> Passing the skb from 6lowpan up to the higher layers is not a
>> function of IPHC.  By moving it out of IPHC we also remove the
>> need to support error code returns with NET_RX codes.
>> It also makes the lowpan_rcv function more extendable as we
>> can support more compression schemes.
>> 
> 
> I will ack this. But please sperate this patch in two. First renaming
> the function namens and then removing deliver callback.
> 
> btw. The correct tag is bluetooth not linux-bluetooth, or bluetooth-next.
> 
> 
> 
> Also this doesn't fix anything? Then this is for bluetooth-next. I know
> this depends on the Patch 1/3. Marcel, do you have any a nice solution
> about this, that we can deal with huge fixes in bluetooth and new features
> for bluetooth-next. Or simple wait when it's merged?

we need to get it into wireless first and pulled by davem. After that I can ask 
John to pull wireless tree back into wireless-next.

Regards

Marcel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to