Better - if its really that chip. 2009/3/26 Taylor Gordon <[email protected]>
> Well, if they didn't want it public, how did the person get it who had > uploaded it? It was obviously either intended on being released publicly, > or > leaked somehow. Either way, not our fault. > > So I say link it up to the wiki, the more people who know about it, the > better! > > Taylor > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Two more things :P. > > > > > > > > Has anyone ever lifted the processor off the 2G or 3G nanos? That would > > determine whether the pins were consistent with the datasheet. > > > > > > > > Also, I'm a little concerned about making a page about the datasheet. > I've > > already decided not to disclose any names or companies that were > involved, > > but should I even have a link up on the wiki? Samsung obviously did not > want > > this going public, and I'm not sure about adding another link to it. > > > > > > > > -Cory Walker > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > > http://www.linux4nano.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > http://www.linux4nano.org > _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
