On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:20:38PM -0500, Ian Ward wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>wrote:
> > the lawyer took it one step further, asking whether there was a way
> > to absolutely *guarantee* that someone you emailed had read that
> > email. i'm not a mail protocol expert but i thought about it briefly,
> > then said i didn't think so, and used my mail setup as an example.
>
> People commonly call a shared exchange server "email", and I believe with
> exchange and a bunch of microsoft email clients you can tell when an email
> has been displayed.
>
> But even then, I don't know how this could ever be the same as saying that
> a person actually *read* the email.
Or whether it was an anti-spam or virus scanner that actually did, or
even a spook.
I'd say that most marketing types and lawyers don't understand the
technology enough to be so certain, particularly if technical folks
don't.
> Ian
slainte mhath, RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs -- ~\ -- ~\ <hpv.tricolour.net>
<www.TriColour.net> -- \___ o \@ @ Ride yer bike!
Ottawa, ON, CANADA -- Lo_>__M__\\/\%__\\/\%
Vote! -- <greenparty.ca>_____GTVS6#790__(*)__(*)________(*)(*)_________________
_______________________________________________
Linux mailing list
Linux@lists.oclug.on.ca
http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux
