* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederman@lnxi.com> [050304 06:02]: > For the web pages I don't care. But for the sources I SVN does not solve > one of our major problems: Multiple repositories. With the Wiki the web page issue has solved.
> So arch aka tla appears to be the sane way to go. It can act as > a shared repository with multiple commiters. It also handles forks > well. Arch among other things is drop dead simple to setup. Pretty > much you need an ssh account that you can place all of your developers > public keys in .ssh/authorized_keys. From there all of the logic > happens remotely with sftp. Stefan can probably testify to that a > little more than I can. Either the authorized_key or a gate keeper can be used. > I am in the process of prototyping it internally to verify that > everything works properly. I have already converted my internal > linuxbios tree with 903 changesets. And have just started doing > a little bit of development on it. So far all of the important > cases involving multiple branches and multiple repositories > seem to work and are relatively easy to handle. after solving the usual python issues I have cscvs working nicely here as well. I am in the progress of setting up a tla version of the repository that is publicly available on openbios.org. It will also be fed into the repository browser viewarch Which one are you using? I have: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/cscvs--hun--1.2 > Ron does this sound like something you would be willing to look at? Let the public import finish and then have a look at the repository on openbios.org. There you can play and find out if you like it. Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios