> > ??? I thought vfat support long filenames. > > I believe it is the length of the pathname rather than individual filenames. > Although some filenames may also be affected. I really don't understand > it either. This is my dim recollection from watching some of the > conversation.
It probally due to the fact that relative paths are limited to 255 characters. -- Richard A. Smith _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
