For the last few months I have been claiming that I had an STPC linuxbios project 
comming up 
"real soon now" 

Well that day of that project is finally here.  Only now its not an STPC based project 
anymore.

Now is a 400 Mhz Celeron 440BX based system with 2 C&T 69000 Video processors and a 
ISA->PCMCIA bridge with 64Megs of RAM.  No other storage rather than RAM will be in 
the 
production unit.  (Prototypes have IDE and CF connectors)

The system is suppoed to boot up init a PCMCIA network card snag all its settings from 
DHCP, 
Pull down a real kernel and boot. The real kernel will mount it's root file system via 
NFS.

I would like to use linuxBios as the bootloader.  Otherwise we are going to have to 
fork 
over some cash and buy one of those bios developement kits.  We have TinyBios but it 
dosen't 
support 440BX.

Things I don't understand or are not clear from the webpage.

        - Satus of 440BX support there appears to be at least one motherboard booting 
with the 
440bx chipeset. Correct?  What kernel is being used?

        - How much flash does one have to have on the MB?  Flash is expensive..We are 
probally 
going to build 10k of these a year so saving .50 or $1 on a smaller flash part is 
worth the 
effort. 
         Whats the minimum size of a linuxbios+linux system that can do TCP/IP?  

        - LOBOS status and use?.  Is this still the way to do the linux-boot-linux 
thing?  The 
code from the webpage was a pain to patch into a kernel since it dosen't use the 
./linux/ as 
the top of the kernel tree.  I managed to patch 2.2.17 with judicial use of symbolic 
links 
but I don't understand how to make my patched kernel boot another kernel with out 
running 
the included lobos command.



--
Richard A. Smith                         Bitworks, Inc.               
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               501.846.5777                        
Sr. Design Engineer        http://www.bitworks.com   


Reply via email to