* ollie lho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020628 08:14]: > On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 13:44, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > > So I am probably going to take a stab at it. But I have to admit > > the more I look at grub the less configurable it feels. The backend > > of grub feels quite flexible, but the rest I really don't know. > > > > I don't know what your are refering as "backend". IMHO, the only > reusable part is the filesystem code. But unfortunately, it is not > as reusable as you or anyone would like to use in his code, if > possible. And the OS image loader is very terrible (your elf_boot > is much better).
The tiara guys used some grub code I think, but I have no idea how they did the glue. http://sourceforge.net/projects/utcboot/ The project seems dead since a while, all the pages on the talkware site have been removed. Best regards, Stefan Reinauer -- The x86 isn't all that complex - it just doesn't make a lot of sense. -- Mike Johnson, Leader of 80x86 Design at AMD Microprocessor Report (1994)
