>> gpl v2. Let's avoid "or later" until that controversy is resolved. > > I don't see a problem with "v2 or later". Everybody who doesn't > like to > use GPLv3 (when it's released) can just chose to use v2. That's > perfectly legal.
FWIW, no one but the original author(s) can decide to re-license "v2 only" code to "v2 or later" (later licenses [can] include extra restrictions, which are explicitly not allowed by the v2 license). Segher -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
