On 2/2/07, Segher Boessenkool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Some Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Acked-by: Some Gal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Applied-by: David H. Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >   OR
> > Commited-by: David H. Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Is there some blindingly obvious reason why one of these two wouldn't
> > be appropriate?
>
> Yes -- it's what Signed-off-by is for already :-)

you are assuming that signed-off-by implies commit rights, and it doesn't.

signed-off-by is necessary but not sufficient. acked-by is necessary
but not sufficient.

ron

-- 
linuxbios mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Reply via email to