ron minnich wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Segher Boessenkool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Some Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Acked-by: Some Gal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Applied-by: David H. Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> OR
>>> Commited-by: David H. Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> Is there some blindingly obvious reason why one of these two wouldn't
>>> be appropriate?
>> Yes -- it's what Signed-off-by is for already :-)
>
> you are assuming that signed-off-by implies commit rights, and it doesn't.
>
> signed-off-by is necessary but not sufficient. acked-by is necessary
> but not sufficient.
>
committed-by can be retrieved from the svn system per revision.
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
--
linuxbios mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
