Hi, On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:46:47AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Well it would be really weird to sign-off on a patch that > you don't agree with, so acked-by is quite redundant if you > already signed off on a patch.
I posted an example a few days ago. I see a patch on the list, take it, modify it to improve _some_ parts of it, but it's still not "finished" and I'm still don't agree that it should be committed. But at least it's a bit better now. In such a case I'd say I should sign-off (as I modified the patch), but I don't want to Ack it. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
