* popkonserve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070818 12:19]:
> user adjustable i would have to enforce them. i don't think that telling
> the user to read the source code and uncomment some performance options
> is a real solution. who wants/can to read the source code anyway?
Basically those people who understand what those options are for. I
doubt anyone who knows that is unable to read a config file.
The question is: Why would you set your system up in a non-optimal way
in the first place.
If a setting is possible, stable and performance-improving, lets always
set it. If not, it is no good?
> since we have the datasheets and the programming skills to adjust
> (almost) anything on the supported chipsets we should share it. this is
> not a risk, it is a feature! if anyone really needs links to performance
> gains beyond the 10% mark i'll post some on the mailing list.
I do agree here. Please do post those links, if possible.
Stefan
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
--
linuxbios mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
