On 27.08.2007 22:08, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:41:54PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> This patch makes ITE SuperI/O probing/dumping a little bit more generic, >> fixes minor codingstyle issues and prepares the table for supporting >> more chips of the ITE IT87xx SuperI/O family. > > Tested on my two ITE-powered boards as you requested.
Thanks! > With IT8702F-A: > > No SuperI/O chip found at 0x002e > No SuperIO chip found at 0x002e > SuperI/O found at 0x2e: id=0x8702, chipver=0x3 > ITE IT8702 > No SuperI/O chip found at 0x004e > No SuperIO chip found at 0x004e > No SuperIO chip found at 0x004e As expected. > With IT8712F-A: > > No SuperI/O chip found at 0x002e > No SuperIO chip found at 0x002e > SuperI/O found at 0x2e: id=0x8712, chipver=0x7 > ITE IT8712 > idx 07 20 21 22 23 24 2b > val 09 87 12 07 01 00 00 > def NA 87 12 08 00 00 00 > [...] As expected. What sort of problems did the board with the IT8712F have? With a dump from under proprietary bios and lb, we can compare and make sure the right registers are set the way you need them. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios