Great, thanks for the patch!

* Markus Boas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070829 15:34]:
> Index: flashchips.c
> ===================================================================
> --- flashchips.c      (Revision 2750)
> +++ flashchips.c      (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@
>        probe_jedec,   erase_chip_jedec, write_49fl004},
>       {"W29C011",     WINBOND_ID,     W_29C011,       128, 128,
>        probe_jedec,   erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
> +     {"W29EE011",    WINBOND_ID,     W_29C011,       128, 128,
> +      probe_w29ee011,        erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},

So is it on purpose that the 29C011 and the 29EE011 have the same ID but
need a different probing sequence?

-- 
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866

-- 
linuxbios mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Reply via email to