Yes, but the W29EE011 is an old device so I think they have recycled the ID.
Am Mittwoch 29 August 2007 schrieb Stefan Reinauer:
> Great, thanks for the patch!
>
> * Markus Boas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070829 15:34]:
> > Index: flashchips.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- flashchips.c (Revision 2750)
> > +++ flashchips.c (Arbeitskopie)
> > @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@
> > probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_49fl004},
> > {"W29C011", WINBOND_ID, W_29C011, 128, 128,
> > probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
> > + {"W29EE011", WINBOND_ID, W_29C011, 128, 128,
> > + probe_w29ee011, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
>
> So is it on purpose that the 29C011 and the 29EE011 have the same ID but
> need a different probing sequence?
--
linuxbios mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
