Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 02:33:36 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
> On 18.10.2007 02:28, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > On 18.10.2007 02:08, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> >> * Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071018 
01:59]:
> >>> My new version is way more generic and hopefully works as well.
> >>> Can you test and give me an Acked-by: line?
> >>
> >> I did not test, but please check this in. We can and will fix and
> >> improve this later as problems or ideas occur...
> >
> > OK. Harald, please check out the code currently in svn and test if it
> > works for you.
svn rev2875 works.

> And if that works, can you also try the following patch against current
> svn?
this patch is also working.
(seems that something else went wrong when we tried to do it with testing the 
busy state of the chip.)

regards,
Harald

> Index: spi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- spi.c     (Revision 2874)
> +++ spi.c     (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -270,17 +270,9 @@
>       generic_spi_write_enable();
>       /* Send CE (Chip Erase) */
>       generic_spi_command(1, 0, cmd, NULL);
> -     /* The chip needs some time for erasing, the MX25L4005A has a maximum
> -      * time of 7.5 seconds.
> -      * FIXME: Check the status register instead
> -      * Do we have to check the status register before calling
> -      * write_disable()? The data sheet suggests we don't have to call
> -      * write_disable() at all because WEL is reset automatically.
> +     /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared */
>       while (generic_spi_read_status_register() & JEDEC_RDSR_BIT_WIP)
>               sleep(1);
> -      */
> -     generic_spi_write_disable();
> -     sleep(8);
>       return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -294,17 +286,9 @@
>               bios[256 * block + i] = buf[256 * block + i];
>       }
>       outb(0, it8716f_flashport);
> -     /* The chip needs some time for page program, the MX25L4005A has a
> -      * maximum time of 5 ms.
> -      * FIXME: Check the status register instead.
> -      * Do we have to check the status register before calling
> -      * write_disable()? The data sheet suggests we don't have to call
> -      * write_disable() at all because WEL is reset automatically.
> +     /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared */
>       while (generic_spi_read_status_register() & JEDEC_RDSR_BIT_WIP)
>               usleep(1000);
> -      */
> -     generic_spi_write_disable();
> -     usleep(5000);
>  }
>
>  void generic_spi_page_program(int block, uint8_t *buf, uint8_t *bios)



-- 
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Reply via email to