On Saturday 12 January 2008, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> BIOS_EMERG is a bit strong because every cold boot will
> trigger that code path by design.
OTOH after the new PLL values the machine _is_ unusable unless reset, right?
As I replied to Ron, this message should be prioritised as high as the highest
other message in that area, to always note that the reset is intentional.
> Someone needs to go through all those printk() and decide which level is
> appropriate for each message.
If they're all BIOS_INFO then there's no problem :-)
> > Acked-by: Torsten Duwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks!
Welcome.
Torsten
--
linuxbios mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
