Ronald G Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Nikolai Vladychevski wrote: > > > is someone using kernels 2.4.16 and higher ? I upgraded to 2.4.16 and I see > > many problems with VM management. After running for 2-3 days processes die > > generating a kernel Oops like this: > > 2.4.16 is a real piece of junk, we avoid it. Doesn't even boot under > vmware any more. I won't touch it.
Ron you shoot from the hip a lot. I'd worry about the vmware case if vmware didn't count as a binary only module. Send that problem to the vmware guys, it is their problem if they can't stably emulate a pc. > I hope the 2.4 series will improve at some point, but from my point of > view it is not converging. And stuff like TUX does not improve the > situation. >From here it is definentily looks to be converging. What does TUX have to do with anything it isn't in the standard kernel, so it shouldn't cause any destablization. Eric
