what kernel version are you running, and did you make it yourself, or is
it a RH kernel.. 

Thank You,
        Ben Kochie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting |  [ Haiku Error Message:          ]
|  PC/Mac Repair        |  [  Chaos reigns within.         ]
|   Networking          |  [  Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net       |  [  Order shall return.          ]
*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]

 "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."

On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, DS wrote:

> check /sbin/ipfwadm -F -l and see if the rules are set.  Then make sure you have
> a rule with (m) from the internal net to 0.0.0.0 (if you're masq to everywhere)
> 
> My question is for an RH 5.0 server.  My firewalling rules won't set-up on
> Linuxconf exit.  I have all the rules set and this worked previously and still
> works on my other machines.  I never get the ipfwadm rules in the preview list
> on exit.  I have ipfwadm 2.3.0-1.  Linuxconf --update doesn't do it either.
> 
> don
> 
> Jason Wilson wrote:
> 
> > I have a RH5.1 server with masquerading set up on it.  It will not
> > masquerade though.  I have another 5.1 machine almost identical except it is
> > running snmp and works and the other machine is not.  Is snmp critical for
> > masquerading and if so how do I load it.
> >
> > Also a possible addition for linuxconf.  What about adding a module to
> > function the same as glint.  If you are running x-windows glint is fine but
> > if you are running command line it doesn't work real well =-).
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ---
> > You are currently subscribed to linuxconf as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe, forward this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to linuxconf as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---
You are currently subscribed to linuxconf as: [[email protected]]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to