Jonathan Marsden writes: >While I now better understand the issue, it feels odd to leave out >sendmail support from a system admin tool I am not satisfied with the approach that linuxconf takes. Things like hard-coding the aliases in /etc/sendmail.cf doesn't seem to me to be normal. >Is there a way to make this approach more obvious than in email from >you here on the list? It doesn't NEED to be. It is ONLY on this list that people have any clue that these other things exist; the average Red Hat Linux 5.2 user will just use what he knows how to use and not get into trouble. Pointing it out in any other forum will simply get people into more trouble, not less. >Also, it would be great if RH could make public their list of known >problems with the 'unsupported' Linuxconf modules, so those here with >the skills and time to do so can work on fixing them and pass patches >back to Jacques. The sendmail problem is that it doesn't follow conventions. Other modules we just (ahem, as I said before) didn't have time to QA because we were focussing on getting the core to work... michaelkjohnson "Magazines all too frequently lead to books and should be regarded by the prudent as the heavy petting of literature." -- Fran Lebowitz Linux Application Development http://www.redhat.com/~johnsonm/lad/ --- You are currently subscribed to linuxconf as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe, forward this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
