a separate thread seems reasonable, but... isn't the upnp stuff needed when sending the inf? or we could treat a client as passive until upnp has done its magic and then switch any already logged in hubs to active when upnp is done...
as to native vs included, it's a matter of settings in the build script, and linux isn't using our build script anyway so it's really up to them... what was/is wrong with miniupnp? ugly code? bad api? unstable? -- UPnP does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of LinuxDC++ Team, which is subscribed to LinuxDC++. Status in ApexDC++ - The Pinnacle of File-Sharing: New Status in DC++: In Progress Status in Linux DC++: New Bug description: Version 0.706. I have UPnP configured correctly in my OS (Windows XP) and my router (Linksys WRT54GL). eMule, Miranda, Skype, uTorrent all work fine and correctly setup ports. However, dc++ does not. It used to work few times, but now it just complains that failed to setup ports. I've run upnp sniffer, and it seems that it doesn't even send out UPnP packets. If you need additional information, please tell what kind and how to get it :) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
