do we *really* need support for more than one upnp implementation? regarding passive, isn't the external ip fetched from upnp? without that, active mode is useless...in the long run, a browser style infobar appearing would probably be the nicest solution...falling back to passive is maybe not desirable but still better than not working at all (and it's closer to the truth - when there's no upnp setup, we're effectively in passive mode)
-- UPnP does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of LinuxDC++ Team, which is subscribed to LinuxDC++. Status in ApexDC++ - The Pinnacle of File-Sharing: New Status in DC++: In Progress Status in Linux DC++: New Bug description: Version 0.706. I have UPnP configured correctly in my OS (Windows XP) and my router (Linksys WRT54GL). eMule, Miranda, Skype, uTorrent all work fine and correctly setup ports. However, dc++ does not. It used to work few times, but now it just complains that failed to setup ports. I've run upnp sniffer, and it seems that it doesn't even send out UPnP packets. If you need additional information, please tell what kind and how to get it :) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linuxdcpp-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
