On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, RoHiT ShArMa wrote:
> >That's nothing, we have a LUG-TSEC! Not going anywhere, though.
> Thats the point I am trying to make Satya, Why bifurcate? Why can't all of
> us just be ILUG-BOM? Wouldn't it help of all the Linux users meet under a
> common organisation? The whole purpose of forming a LUG gets humped if you
> have different sub-Lugs under the same LUG.
The point of having a sub-LUG in college is that since we are in the same
building at about the same time every day, so it is (or should be!) easier
to meet. Plus, we know each other.
The purpose of LUGTSEC does NOT include replacement of ILUG-BOM,
but to supplement it.
> Guru's like john,satya,Sagar,Nagarjuna etc. I'm sure they would help. If you
hehe, thanks for calling me a guru :)
> Lets commend the thought and effort put by people like John , Nagarjuna ,
> Amit, Sagar etc in the starting up and maintaining of the LUG and lets not
Hear, hear!
--
Satya.
Freelance website designer and CGI/Perl programmer.
http://satyaonline.cjb.net/
