Certain issues which I'd like to highlight
   
The config has been modified in such a way that the default reply goes to the person who sent the mail only and not the group .. Only if considered necessary send the reply to the group .. Also on the cards is to include a header on the subject [linuxers] ... which would help in the proper and easier filtration  of the mails ..
 
By the way I'd prefer if we get the suggestions from the group regarding what should be actually discussed at the meet .. This time the meet I'm afraid to say got a cold response from the other LUG members .. If we are a Group having a common goal 1) why was the attendance only around 20-25 .. as compared to 70-75 which attended the bangalore LUG's..
2)
< sarcasm >
 All members of the LUG ( At least the core members ) also have a lot other things at hand but still make an effort for the linux users which was simply not acknowledged for at this meet .. Apart from a handful members and people who were actually interested stayed on and discussed stuff that concerned the LUG .. We have come a long way from the kind of support that we faced in the old days where configuring an X server took me 2 months .. yes that's correct 2 months and that kinda info is available now in hardly minutes  ....
Apart from the support from Prakash and the resources from Dinesh which we thought of taking it as a workshop
</sarcasm >
 
Q .  [ Do I take it that people on this list are not that active and are partly not interested apart from their own problems ]
I want some comments especially from the core members ..
Sagar suggested that we concentrate on the problems and have explicitly longer sessions on the same
Accepted ..
Apart from that I'd like the members to send issues  / topics that could be discussed in the coming meetings
 
Regards
Sandesh
 
If this mail hurts someone .. sorry there .. that wasn't my intention
Flames welcome .... but personally to my email ID .. not to the list if it is specific

Reply via email to