On 19/03/06 13:02 +0530, Dinesh A. Joshi wrote: > On Sunday 19 March 2006 02:14 am, Devdas Bhagat wrote: > > No. We were pointing out that the proposed course is wrong. The > > correct thing to do is to put the disclaimer in the MUA. > > Human tendency is to take the easiest way out which may not always be > the correct way. Any sysadmin will prefer to configure the MTA than go > around the entire office configuring multiple MUAs. Besides the latter
Wrong. Message body modification is to be done in the MUA. Any good sysadmin implements it correctly. > means that each individual user can decide whether to display the > disclaimer or not and a lot more work for the sysadmin. > You mean, like writing/implementing a plugin for the MUA to automatically insert the disclaimer when sending? So that the user really can't avoid it? > > It might help to actually think about what we are saying, intead of > > trying to read tones of voice into it. > > Questioning ones requirement isn't something nice especially after the > OP has stated that it is the client's requirement and he can't do > anything about it. He can actually *gasp* educate the client. Devdas Bhagat -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
