On Saturday 18 March 2006 3:23 pm, Dinesh A. Joshi wrote: > On Saturday 18 March 2006 03:13 pm, JTD wrote:
> > It serves no purpose legally or otherwise. So why waste server > > bandwidth. The fact that the recipients email id is in one of the > > headers is sufficient for you to use that email in any legal way. > > I dont think the OP wanted anybody to drag this thread off topic. > If you want to discuss disclaimers and their uselessness then > please start a new thread. Please don't drag this one off topic. > Besides the OP has stated that its the clients requirements so > questioning him about the reasons that they want the disclaimer is > pointless. This is a bit late. But it wasn't ot at all. I am sick of receiving one line mails with 20 line disclaimers from banks, phone cos., credit card cos, sundry 2bitmarketroids etc etc etc etc. My point is that customers want a lot of crap without knowing anything about it's usefulness. GNU/Linux vendors should do better than continue shoddy practices. Do educate the customer instead. Particularly when they are paying you $-). -- rgds jtd -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
