On Wednesday 29 August 2007 10:58, Rahulkrishna Gupta wrote:

> >
> > However avoid Novell-Suse like the plague (at least get rid of it
> > within 180 days if u must taste forbidden fruit). Reason - you
> > are in a legal limbo with that distro.
>
> Can the poster please explain the basis of above statements.

Everyone would much prefer that Novell issue an official statement 
clarifying their stance about redistribution of Novell Suse distros 
and their upgarde/additive licence. Heck no that is too complicated 
and difficult u know - make alist of gpl/mpl/apl stuff and a list of 
EULA restricted stuff. Instead u ask me to clarify. wonderful.

> Or is this just another case of spreading FUD, 

Really? Could you please ask Novell and M$?. We would love to hear 
what they say. Should be easy for you.

> especially to people 
> who are new to Linux and whom you are in a position to influence.

Or to word it differently - move them away from the hook before they 
take the bait?

Grep the list archives. also read the Novell licence  which i am sure 
u have access to. Ok, here is the top secret url
http://www.novell.com/licensing/eula/sled_10/sled_10_english.pdf

>
> Note: I have no intention to start a flame war, but when you say
> strong words about any product / project, please back them up with
> reasonable facts.

Really? U may like to research the word FUD and read about the Novell 
M$ deal other than what Novell dishes out to justify the deal.

To cut a long story short, using a Novell-Suse distro for more than 
the stipulated period (180 days) or beyond the permtted scope (no 
bench marking, no reverse engineering, no distribution outside your 
organisation etc etc) will void your licence to use. 
Also Novell agrees with M$ that it's distro contains M$ patented stuff 
(what stuff?, well, neither party cares to identify) and as a result 
of that agreement if anyone uses the distro, after cessation of the 
licence, can be sued by M$.
Says who? Says M$. But the friend of the friend of the xyz who works 
at Novell says differently. Get it?.

And by the way if you could go through the Novell website and provide 
proof to the contrary of the above in the form of an official Novell 
statement, it would help cut short any Ramayanic discourse on the 
motives, content and intentions of all parties and their licences.

So instead of wasting our time decoding random licence symbols and 
legalese, just use several of the other distros that have a rock 
solid reuputaion for upholding freedom and staying away from the 
companies responsible for the OS mess.  
Debian, Ubuntu/Kubntu, Gentoo, Sabyon, RH, Fedora, Knoppix etc etc

-- 
Rgds
JTD

-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to