On Thursday 30 August 2007 13:43, Mrugesh Karnik wrote: > > The thing is, people other than you also have likes, dislikes, > opinions, points of view etc.
We are talking of technical, commercial and legal aspects - all of which are grounded in fact and logic - not the color of somebody's undepants > For example, I don't know about > anyone else, but I dislike the way you state your opinions. Now > that's just my opinion. > > Are we OT already? the digressed discusion was about licences and alleged fud But your abv sentence is definetly ot. Note that we still dont have any reply to our grouse about Novell's licence - Rahulkrishna Gupta has a novell.com email so i presume that he is a Novell employee. Searching google i find his posts from 2001 so i presume he is quite thoroughly aware of the poltics of freesoftware. So his statement about me spreadind fud is ????. It happens all the time all over the world, make a statement about Novell licence and someone will spring at you with inuendo. But never in all these months a simple statement of fact. These are the packages that are restricted and these are the packages that are libre. such a statement would make the Microvell deal a simple business decision not the subterfuge that it seems to us on the outside - designed to con the innocent and misappropriate from the commons. -- Rgds JTD -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
