On Jan 16, 2008 2:42 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 16-Jan-08, at 2:11 PM, jtd wrote: > > >>> But browsing several issues at the news > >>> stand most certainly found the content to be poor. I dont see any > >>> reason why the mag cant have proper editorial staff capable of > >>> doing their job and providing at least some good content. > >> > >> did you look at the latest issue? I suggest you do so before making > >> further comments - vastly improved from what it was even 6 months > >> back. > > > > ok ok. Off to the newsstand > > > >> They fill in stuff from Linux world, but that > >> is because they dont get enough articles from locals (hint: how > >> about one from you) > > > > You want them to shutdown or what? ;-E > > no - honestly. As already mentioned, I have only looked at the last 2 > or 3 issues as I get them free now, so cannot comment on the past.
there is always the traditional discomfort on finding something defective in what one buys! Karunakar -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
