Information Security wrote:
>
> Yes are really cheap compared to the local cable operators & with very
> min or i would say 1% downtime tillnow. The bandwidth is perfect as
> per what i have tested in field tests & also some reviews from my
> friends who live in the worli area. They have a problem with the dhcp
> taking a long duration for assigning ip addresses.
>
> I would like to know has any person really terminated the reliance
> connection after the wimax router to any wifi router for use on
> laptops etc.
>
>
>   
A client of mine uses Reliance WiMax in his office. Now that you 
mentioned the dhcp problem, I recollect the client mentioning that the 
device has to be started 10 min before they start work. Otherwise it 
works fine. The client is into share trading and his systems are updated 
every second. The WiMax is also routed to the Netgear Wireless router 
for his laptop. Sometimes to take care of downtime, the MTNL router is 
also in the circuit with appropriate IPs. The client simply changes the 
gateway and DNS (same as gateway) entry.

For WiMax, the minimum height of the dish antenna has to be 3rd floor 
and facing the tower without much obstacles.

-- 
Regards,

Rony.

GNU/Linux !
No Viruses
No Spyware
Only Freedom.

-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
  • [ILUG... Pradeepto Bhattacharya
    • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
    • ... Harsh Busa
    • ... Abhishek Ambe rkar [अभिषेक]
    • ... kmk...@anantcorp.com
      • ... Abhishek Ambe rkar [अभिषेक]
        • ... Harsh Busa
        • ... Koustubha Kale
          • ... Information Security
            • ... Koustubha Kale
            • ... Rony
            • ... Dileep Kumar M [ദിലീപ ് കുമാ൪]
              • ... Aseem Rane
                • ... Harsh Busa
                • ... Arun Khan
                • ... Dinesh Shah (દિન ેશ શાહ/द िनेश शाह)
                • ... Raj Mathur
                • ... Dinesh Shah (દિન ેશ શાહ/द िनेश शाह)
                • ... Arun Khan
                • ... Arun Khan
                • ... Dileep Kumar M [ദ ിലീപ ് കു മാര് ‍ എം]

Reply via email to