On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:33:01AM -0500, Satya wrote: > >> FWIW, I'm voting *against* separate lists. I'm for one list. (Or two, > >> one regular one jobs/commercial. That's what UUASC does.) > >What's UUASC and how does it in any way affect our behaviour? > > unix users association of southern california. It doesn't.
The content of your mail *implied* that since UUASC does it, it's a good model to follow. Hence the question. Otherwise, how is the statement 'That's what UUASC does.' related to this post? > >If you have more convincing arguments, please put forth. > > That's how I feel. I did say I was voting. I did not say I was arguing > (as in "debate" not as in "fight"). But, if I am asking for forking with reasons, shouldn't you too give reasons in support of your views? Doesn't it make sense? Your mail is useful input in a 'poll', but doesn't help arrive at any conclusions in this thread/debate. Of course, to make things clear (as was implied in another mail), nothing like a 'dogfight' here. I think we have lost the art of arguing, assuming that arguing and confronting are synonymous. No! -- jaju -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
