Morning Sir,
--- Devdas Bhagat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those who do not understand TCP... [snip] Thanks Devdas for having enlightened us. > > If you need reliability, use TCP. > If you need performance, and can sacrifice > reliability, use UDP. > If you want both, buy more bandwidth, and sign a SLA > with your provider > for the reliability. [snip] Devdas, the issue is not about SLA's not about B/W and not about reliability atleast for now. We are discussing on getting the max throput thro either TCP-UDP. Post having achieved the same reliability-scalability-redundancy-performance-cpu consumption need to be looked into. We are in a phase where these protocols are being stressed on various OS stacks. I assume you are smart enough to have gorged enough of TCP/IP through your career. You may not necessarily want to help but please understand the objective before you make such comments. Atleast i do feel you came across in an uncouth manner. Have a great day Mr. Bhagat. Trevor > > Devdas Bhagat > > -- > http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers > |------|____________________________________|------| ( >- / Scaling FreeSoftware & OpenSource \ -< ) /~\ / In the Enterprise \ /~\ | \) \ | www.fsf.org | www.opensource.org | / (/ | |_|_ \____________________________________/ _|_| __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
