On Oct 8, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/7/07, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +
>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + #address-cells = <3>;
>> + device_type = "pci";
>> + compatible = "mpc5200-pci";
>> + reg = <d00 100>;
>> + interrupt-map-mask = <f800 0 0 7>;
>> + interrupt-map = <c000 0 0 1 &mpc5200_pic 0
>> 0 3
>> + c000 0 0 2 &mpc5200_pic 0
>> 0 3
>> + c000 0 0 3 &mpc5200_pic 0
>> 0 3
>> + c000 0 0 4 &mpc5200_pic 0
>> 0 3>;
>> + clock-frequency = <0>; // From boot loader
>> + interrupts = <2 8 0 2 9 0 2 a 0>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
>> + bus-range = <0 0>;
>> + ranges = <42000000 0 80000000 80000000 0
>> 10000000
>> + 02000000 0 90000000 90000000 0
>> 10000000
>> + 01000000 0 00000000 a0000000 0
>> 01000000>;
>> + };
>
> Also, the PCI node should no longer be a child of the 'soc' node. See
> the latest lite5200.dts file in Paul Mackerras' powerpc tree for an
> example.
Also, note how the PCI node is a sibling of the soc node not a child
of it.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
