On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 16:43 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 17:53 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > I don't see this, in all cases write_msi_msg() will transfer
> > the given "*msg" to entry->msg by this assignment in
> > drivers/pci/msi.c:
> > 
> > void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
> > {
> >  ...
> >     entry->msg = *msg;
> > }
> > 
> > So as long as write_msi_msg() is invoked, it will be saved
> > properly.
> > 
> > Platforms need not do this explicitly.
> 
> I'm short on context here, and it's Saturday, so excuse me if I'm
> missing the point somewhere.
> 
> On pseries machines we don't call write_msi_msg(), because we don't
> control the contents of the message, firmware does. So entry->msg will
> be bogus.
> 
> That's a pity, but AFAIK it shouldn't be a problem because we don't
> enable CONFIG_PM on those machines anyway. If we ever want to we'll need
> to sort out with firmware how that will work WRT restoring MSI state.
> 

The PCI error recovery that Linas is working on requires the MSI state
to be restored after we do PCI reset to recover from PCI errors.


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to